Showing posts with label Discussion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Discussion. Show all posts

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Star Wars: Starkiller Base and Death Star

Star Wars: Force Awakens Repeats Previous Star Wars Plots

 

Starkiller Base and the Death Star

Not again. Hollywood has a penchant for sticking to tried and true formulas. This is exactly why franchises are born, whether that be an expansion of the Harry Potter or Star Wars universes. Building on a loved and cherished movie is extremely profitable given the existence of a loyal fan base. Look at the box office numbers for Star Wars: The Force Awakens and this point is proved immediately.

But the problem arises when a movie’s plot relies on formulas excessively. While the new Star Wars movie is one that I particularly enjoyed, it does tend to rely on an over-familiar narrative direction. I’m referring to Starkiller Base, or Death Star 2.0, or is it 3.0? 

The nefarious First Order in the Force Awakens has constructed a gargantuan solar system destroyer, which in itself is a planet. It ultimately serves as a modified, evolved version of the Empire’s Death Star. The first Death Star was finished after the Clone Wars and was able to destroy a planet with its primary weapon. Then in the movie The Empire Strikes Back, it was demolished by Luke Skywalker. Then there was the reconstruction of the Death Star as Death Star II, but before it was put into action, The Millennium Falcon saw to its end. 

And then this year, with The Force Awakens, we had the Starkiller Base, which was able to not only obliterate a single planet but an entire solar system.  It is simply a bigger and badder Death Star. Starkiller Base represents a significant flaw in the Hollywood blockbuster system, which mirrors the studios’ approach to extending franchise life cycles: sticking with the material that worked. 

My first impression upon seeing Starkiller Base was, “Really? Another Death Star?” I’m a fan of nostalgic movie moments, which The Force Awakens provides in ample doses with throwbacks. But here, with Starkiller Base, I got the impression that the writers hit some form of brick wall and decided to resuscitate the Death Star because they ran out of ideas. A shortcut to getting out of writer’s block. 

This poses some significant problems for the future Star Wars installments. In a trilogy, the natural progression of the story requires the stakes to rise with each passing movie. A prime example is with Lord of the Rings. In Two Towers, you had the battle at Helms Deep. In Return of the King, the battled moved up to Minas Tirith and for the overall fate of Middle Earth in front of the Gates of Mordor. 

With the news Star Wars trilogy, the writer’s opted to go big from the get-go with a superior Death Star from Episode VII itself. They also destroyed it in that very same episode. So what next? Is Episode VIII or IX likely to see an even bigger Death Star, 4.0? I mean, you already had a solar system destroying weapon, so how are the stakes going to be raised even further? 

I conjecture that the story will instead opt to raise the emotional stakes and complexity of the new trilogy. Already, The Force Awakens displayed more nuance when it came to the Light and Dark sides of the force than any of the previous movies. This was done effectively with Kylo Ren, though I felt at times he was another rendition of the pouty Anakin Skywalker. Personal conflict will probably take the spotlight in the upcoming movies as opposed to another mammoth weapon of mass destruction. The way Force Awakens ended, Ren was on his way to Supreme Leader Snoke (Darth Plagueis?) to complete his training, while Rey was also likely to be trained by Luke Skywalker. The two will then face off in the final installment while dealing with the emotional baggage surrounding either, Ren having killed his father and Rey trying to figure out who the hell she is. 

This is where I see the future heading, and I can’t contemplate another Death Star of any kind. If Snoke is indeed Plagueis, though, then there’s some interesting material to cover with his apparent power to be immortal, as the last time I checked, Darth Sidius poisoned Plagueis in his sleep.

Side Note: Another point of plot regurgitation was the eventual Sith Apprentice killing off an entire group of young Padawan. In Revenge of the Sith, that task was handled by Hayden Christensen’s Anakin Skywalker. This time round, the child-killer responsibilities fell to Adam Driver’s Kylo Ren.

star wars first order starkiller base
The First Order at Starkiller Base

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Poll: Anthony Hopkins or Mads Mikkelsen as Hannibal Lecter?

Hannibal Poll

Anthony Hopkins or Mads Mikkelsen?

hannibal anthony hopkins mads mikkelsen

Over the years, we have had several performances of the infamous Hannibal the Cannibal, starting with Brian Cox's performance and now, we have Mads Mikkelsen's with the TV version of the character. With NBC deciding to cancel the show after the third season,

Saturday, December 6, 2014

Movie Poll: Black James Bond

A friend of mine recently mused about the idea of an African American or black actor playing James Bond, since thus far, over 23 movies, you may have noticed that all the James Bond characters were white. 2 names at the top of that list happen to be Denzel Washington and Idris Elba. Washington become a candidate during an AMA Reddit session where he expressed interest in the role, and then came along a Twitter trend #DenzelIsJamesBond to promote the actor’s bid for the role. My friend came up with Idris Elba’s name and Elba, too, has spoken on the matter, saying that he hates the term Black Bond, but that isn’t going to stop people from speculating about his involvement in the franchise. Who do you think is ideal for the role? I'd go with Elba, because he's British and is much younger compared to Washington.

denzel washington idris elba

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Charlie Sandin in 'The Purge': Annoying Character or Plot Necessity?

Max Burkholder Plays Annoying Character

(Warning: Spoiler Alerts)

Max Burkholder Charlie Sandin The Purge

The Purge was a movie that boasted a very strong premise. It revolved around the idea that there would be one day every year where America would be lawless, and people could commit any crime without punishment, a period of impunity. It had created an idyllic society with low crime rates and

Friday, August 23, 2013

Does Wolverine Need Romance?

Does Romance Ruin The Wolverine's Character?

Wolverine and Jean Grey


Wolverine has a rough exterior, both in appearance and demeanor. His body is coated with thick black hair on his arms and chest while he sports massive sideburns to rival a

Friday, August 2, 2013

2015 Movie Lineup: Biggest Year for Movies

Over-Crowded Movie Calendar

2015 movies james bond avengers star wars

2015 is being proclaimed as the greatest year for movies. One look at the line up on the calendar will help you realize why. Despite Avatar 2 being postponed to 2016, 2015 will

Monday, July 15, 2013

Man of Steel vs. Pacific Rim: Why Critics Like One And Not The Other

Why Critics Viewed the 2 Blockbusters Differently

Man of Steel Superman Henry CavillPacific Rim monster Kaiju


For this summer’s line up, Warner Bros. has contributed two mammoth box office pictures through ‘Man of Steel’ and ‘Pacific Rim’. Yet both pictures have not been received in a positive light by critics. Man of Steel has had the erudite movie scholars divided while

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Do Movie Pre-Orders Hurt The Box Office?

Movies Available to Pre-Order alongside Initial Premiere

H39C64KTK2FV

A recent phenomenon that has plagued the entertainment industry is movie pre-ordering. Most of the time, movies are available to pre-order as soon as it hits the box office, often coinciding with the premiere release. It happened with G.I. Joe: retaliation and Star Trek into Darkness. In my opinion, this has to hurt the box office.