Why Reboot The Terminator?
Left to Right: Brie Larson, Emilia Clarke, Margot Robbie
I now understand the frustration hardcore fanatics of a film
feel when a reboot of their beloved movie is announced. The Terminator reboot
is definitely underway as screen tests are apparently
being undertaken for the
role of Sarah Connor. Well, the screen tests are supposed to be happening in
the coming weeks. There are 3 front runners, who happen to be Margot Robbie,
Brie Larson and Game of Throne’s Emilia Clarke, who plays Daenerys Targaryen on
the HBO show.
The first Terminator movie was released in 1984. Since
Hollywood has now earned a reputation for unearthing treasures from those
ancient years, I’m not entirely surprised by the move to start a reboot. 1984
was a very long time ago. But still, I watched all the Terminator movies only a
few years ago, and the image of the original films is still fresh in my mind.
Commercially, I’m not sure how the reboot will go down.
Statistically speaking, reboots do well since they mine an existing fan base on
top of the new audience. The recent Carrie remake did reasonably well, opening
to $16.1 million in the first weekend at home. But I’m sure some fans must be
worried about the remake simply spoiling the goodwill of the originals, and
hence they may simply refrain from visiting the theaters, but that hardly happens
as fans would prefer to go watch a horrible reboot and then criticize it
online.
But my larger concern
is revisiting the same plot points once again, which doesn’t exactly help a
reboot stand out by itself. This definitely was what happened with The Amazing
Spider-Man 2. Uncle Ben’s death and the Spider bite were 2 events that were
once again explored since they are integral events in creating the superhero.
The same thing can happen with The Terminator. We may in fact run into the same
storyline that made the original series exemplary.
A bit more thought, though, and it may seem like the reboot
can avoid the pitfalls that most remakes have. Terminator is a movie about time
travel, where past, present and future become melded and warped to twist the
audience’s minds. This feature of time travel can help the film adjust the
storyline in ways that other remakes can’t. Time travel allows additional
alternatives to be considered by the decision makers, or the actors in the
movie. This may allow the reboot to avoid a lack of creative ingenuity.
To further boost the movie’s hype, director Alan Taylor is
keen on bringing Tom Hardy aboard for the role of John Connor. This man
embodies masculinity so I wouldn’t even dare argue with that choice if it turns
out to be true. Garrett Hedlund of Tron: Legacy is also at the top of the list
to play Kyle Reese. Going for recognizable faces should aid Paramount in
enhancing its earnings, especially since having well-known celebrities gives
movie goers the impression that a film is taking itself seriously if the actors
are confident enough to come on board.
Personally, I deem the reboot unnecessary because I know the
original series can still stand tall in today’s movie industry. The special
effects, while dated, are realistic and not comical in any way. This together
with a remarkable story, makes Terminator a timeless movie. This can’t be said
about the original Superman movies because while the story was outstanding, the
special effects of the time hindered the overall impression the movie gave.
Getting a child today to watch the movie will be a difficult task. One look at
the effects in use and they might start laughing. Terminator doesn’t have that
problem. It was more than good back then and still is now.
Sources:
http://www.totalfilm.com/news/rumour-emilia-clarke-testing-for-sarah-connor-in-terminator-reboot
Sources:
http://www.totalfilm.com/news/rumour-emilia-clarke-testing-for-sarah-connor-in-terminator-reboot
No comments:
Post a Comment